Friday, May 31, 2019

A Bottle of Tyme Essay -- UEC Economics Essays

A Bottle of Tyme The United European Countries was formed just before the collapse of the United States of America. The Survivors of the Clones true charitable purge sought refuge in the UEC, specific bothy England, where they were welcomed with open arms, as much of their work force had been destroyed by the Arab invaders. The UEC is lead by chair Hartford, who was elected to her second term just before the conflict first began between the United States and the Arab Empire. She heads the executive branch of the UEC, while the Senate embodies the Legislative branch. The Upper Senate is comprised of 4 Senators from each representative country, regardless of size or population. The Lower Senate has membership based on population, and so, each country receives one Lower Senator for every lead million people. Each European country is treated as a semi-independent state, much as the states of the United States were. Each countrys national lecture is maintained, as are their customs and lifestyles. The only real difference is that their governments are now working together under a solidified government, not the considerably sidestepped UN, which failed to halt the Arab uprising in the first place. As it is a fairly new governmental body, the UEC doesnt suffer from the internal sabotage most modern-day governments are faced with, although the individual governments of each representative country are still ripe with corruption, as they neednt change much to be authorized into the UEC. As such, the various countries in the UEC get along extraordinarily well with each other, but enter the country, and one can easily see that conjunction on its most basic levels has begun to break ... ...n of untied countries. Their conquered lands were then given to the peasants who suffered so horribly at their hands. Although the Empire has been crushed to a mere of its pilot film power, it still controls the oil fields of Saudi-Arabia and has many sleeper cells across the globe. Perhaps one day it will strike out again at all who would oppose them. Back in North America, Canada and Mexico were in the clutch of fear, fear of invasion by the clones running rampant across the former United States. Although they were cognizant by the clone leaders that no harm would come to them, they remain wary of the clones every move. As for the Clone Nation itself, through what surveillance is available, it seems that a form of forced socialism exists, with complete breakdown of social class structure and religious ideologies.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Its Time to Lower the Drinking Age :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

In the United States, it is illegal to consume alcohol until the ripen of twenty-one. At the epoch of eighteen people atomic number 18 considered adults. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen-years of age or older, to voting shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age (Amendment 26, Section 1 of the Constitution). At the age of eighteen, a person can get married, vote, drive, take out loans, pay taxes, buy tobacco, have sex, be assay as an adult, have children, use credit cards, buy real estate, act independently of parents and be in the armed forces and authorise for their country. If we look at Vietnam War, half of the soldiers that fought in that war were under the age of twenty-one, and a lot of them were 17 to 19 years old. Yet that person still can not salute alcohol. Also we can smoke when we are eighteen. Smoking kills just as many people if not more than drunkenness. Smoking causes cancer, and many more conditions compared to drinking that causes liver problems only after sever abuse of it. Smoking has many chemicals including carbon monoxide which is so poisonous that we have alarms in our house that detect it, scarce we can smoke and not drink. We can vote when we are eighteen. We vote for bills and bonds that change our lives. We can vote for the senators and the entire Congress that propose laws that govern our society. We vote for the President who is the commander of millions of troops whom he can send to their deaths in a minutes warning. It is imperative that the drinking age be let down to the age of eighteen. The drinking age must be lowered to the age of eighteen because this age would be consistent with some opposite responsibilities that the government ____ grants eighteen-year-olds. For instance, at the age of eighteen, a person is liable to be in the armed forces. If a person is being trusted to fight or even possibly die for their country, it seems a lot less c rucial to trust them with an alcoholic beverage. To add to the fact of dying for their country, these people are being counted on to kill other humans. This seems unreasonable that a person is liable to take on an adults job, that involves the future of the country, and still be unable to enjoy an activity that other adults are allowed to participate in.

Yeats’ Second Coming and Cummings’ what if a much of a which of a wind

The End of the World in Yeats Second Coming and e. e. cummings what if a much of a which of a wind Hellfire and brimstone, a massive environmental disaster, a third World War how will the piece end? This issue can stop conversations, or start hour long arguments it can start a religion, or cause people to stop their faith. The answer to the ubiquitous question of how the world will eventually end is a paradox to know the answer means that the final hour has come. twain E.E. Cummings and William Butler Yeats press out their premonitions about when and why this awesome event may occur. Both prophetize about the horrific destruction of the world in their poems, what if a much of a which of a wind and The Second Coming however, Cummings and Yeats disagree on the final cause of this destruction. While both utilize computer graphic imagery, stark contrast, and unique syntax to warn their readers about the evils of mankind, Cummings predicts societys irresponsible use of technology wi ll engender the worlds end, while Yeats believes that men themselves, the worst full-of-the-moon of passionate meretriciousness, will ultimately cause the downfall of civilization. Cummings use of intense and somewhat disturbing imagery in his poem what if a much of a which of a wind urges readers to realize the extent of the devastation caused by catastrophic, preventable, destruction. The first stanza of the poem, describing images such as the sun bloodying the leaves, evokes terror in the reader. The thought of the sun, usually associated with frenzy and love, destroying something that it has helped to develop, directly parallels technologys current role in society. Technology, usually thought of as beneficial to mankind, slowly destroys the society that it ... ...thinkers since the beginning of time. E.E. Cummings and William Butler Yeats felt compelled to express their thoughts as to the imminent destruction of mankind. However, what they were unaware of at the the time that they wrote their prophetic poems, was how frighteningly true their predictions almost came. Yeats commentary regarding the leaders of the world and their passionate intensity prophetized the Holocaust of World War II and the autocracies created by Hitler and Stalin, while the masses lacking all conviction sat and watched with passive indifference. E.E. Cummings description of mans misuse of technology, was exemplified by the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These poets sounded an alarm that was ignored hopefully we are now prepared to heed their warnings so that their dire predictions will not install to be ultimately true.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Abortion: More Harm than Good Essay -- The Right to Life, Pro-Life Essa

In todays society abortion is getting more observation then ever. After the president banned partial birth abortion controversy arose from all sides of the table and has been since Roe v. Wade. Many women today feel as if they should have the right to chose either to bring life into this world or not. These women feel as if abortion will dedicate them a sense of relief. What many an(prenominal) of these pro-choicers dont realize is that abortion causes more destruction then relief. Mothers who chose to abort their baby dont realize the post abortion destruction aborting has. These Mothers see it as relief from having to give birth to an unwanted child. Yes, if women have an abortion she will not have to bring an unwanted baby into the world, that is it really a relief? stillbirth brings along with it many destructive packages. Packages of murder, emotional and psychological effects along with medical problems.So, Now your thinking Abortion isnt murder, the baby is not even born(p) yet. Well Abortion is murder. An innocent human life is brutally murdered all(prenominal) 22 seconds in the United States. That is a lot of babies being killed every day, and thats just in the United States.At a senate Judiciary sub mission in 1981 the hearing was about When does a human life begin. Appearing at this committee was a group of internationally known geneticists and biologists. Dr. Hymie Gordon along with all the others in the group agreed that by all criteria of modern molecular biology life is present from the moment of conception (Dr. Hymie Gordon)Former abortionist David Brewer M.D says, My heart callous agai... ...d from rape or incest. Those giving an opinion 90 part said they would discourage other victims of sexual violence from having an abortion(Reardon, Victims and Victors) Among the women in the survey who h ad a baby, not one expressed regret about her choice. A woman who was a victim of sexual violence says, What rape takes away from a women abortion can not restore.In todays world abortion is looked upon as a relief mechanism. Young women turn to abortion to escape the responsibility of their actions or from the actions forced upon them. In the long run abortion does nothing but cause destruction not only to the unborn baby but also to the aborting mother. Abortion causes more destruction than relief.

Heritage as an Idea of Oneself in Bless Me Ultima and The Lone Ranger a

Heritage as an Idea of Oneself in arouse Me Ultima and The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven Traveling through humanity is a never-ending story. Traveling through ethnicity is an ever changing journey. Is race or culture a matter of color? Is it a direction of life or a decision an individual makes? Is it an idea one has of themselves? In the novels, Bless Me Ultima (Anaya 1972) and The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven (Alexie 1993), cardinal different minority characters, Tony and Victor, give voice to their journey of growing up and finding their place in the world in regards to their heritage. The characters, in Anayas and Alexies novels, relate to a dominant culture, pursue balance in their life by searching traditions of the past, and attempt to blend their heritage into the present allowing them passage to the future. Their journeys differ in gaze to heritage and family situation. Their journeys parallel considering that they be both male, be want to a minority, seek individual identity, and search for their place on the planet. Each seeks peace within and without. Although, their journeys are different, they are the same. The characters in the two novels, belong to two different cultures. In Rudolfo Anayas Bless Me Ultima, the young, Mexican-American Anthony Juan Marez y Luna (Tony) struggles between two ways of being a Spanish-Mexican-American era also dealing with the dominant white culture. Tonys mother and father, although both born in New Mexico, come from two different cultures. His father, a Marez, comes from a long line of Spanish conquistadores, men as restless as the seas they sailed and as free as the land they conquered (Anaya 6). Tonys mother, a Luna, comes fr... ... America, 1982. 80-167. Meacham, Jon. Redefining Race in America. Newsweek September 2000 38-41. Mitchell, Carol. Rudolfo Anayas Bless Me, Ultima Folk Culture in Literature. Critique Studies in Modern Fiction. 17.1 1980, 55-64. Smoke Signals. Dir. Ch ris Eyre. With Adam Beach and Evan Adams. Miramax/Shadowcatcher. Prod. Larry Estes and Scott Rosenfelt. 1997. Tonn, Horst. Bless Me, Ultima A Fictional Response to Times of Transition. Aztlan, 18.1 1987, 59-68. White, Craig. American Minority Literature. Handout. University of Houston-Clear Lake. Houston. 24 August 2000. - - - - - American Minority Literature. Notes. 27 September 2000. Yancey, William L. Ericksen, Eugene P. and Juliani, Richard N. Emergent Ethnicity A Review and Reformulation. American Sociological Review 41.3 1976 391-403.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Beowulf Vs. Grendel :: essays research papers

Grendal, a descendant of Cain, is angiotensin-converting enzyme of the main antagonist of the poem Beowulf. He lives under an catching curse and is denied Gods presence. Throughout the story Grendal causes enormous grief and fear to the people of Herot. After so much pain and agony the major power of Herot, Hrothgar, sends for the protagonist of the poem, Beowulf. He is a Geat and the epic hero of the poem. The wide variety of distinctions between Grendal and Beowulf is what develops the climax of the composition. Beowulf kills Grendal, so he is honored by the people of Herot for his imposing act. Since Grendal and Beowulf play opposite roles in the poem, Beowulf, they let the reader know how contrasting characters can develop the plot of the story. Grendal is known as a monster and portrays one of the many villains in the poem. He is referred to as the "guardian of his sins". Grendal depicts a heathen the physical image of man estranged from God. Basically, Grendal refl ects a physical monster, an ogre who is incompatible to humanity. Grendals constant visits to Hrothgars mead hall for bloody feasts made him feel powerful over Gods humanity. Unfortunately, the night Beowulf lies in wait for him, he assumes that his bloody feasts will continue and Grendal gives no attention to his method of attack. Grendal is then killed. Beowulf, the heroic figure in the poem, is known throughout the land as a courageous man who performs great deeds of valor. He is a Geat, who later becomes the king of the Geats. Beowulfs strength seems to be a gift from God. As a noble and kind man, Beowulf comes to Herot to save them from Gods foe. Before Beowulf initiates battle with Grendal he exhibits a sense of fairness in not using a weapon against the monster. This demonstrates a great difference between the two characters. Had Beowulfs attack not been unexpected, Grendal surely would have used a weapon. Beowulfs frustration against Grendal sets one of the first stepping stones to his long legacy of heroic deeds. Both of these characters remain static throughout the poem. Beowulf portrays the heroic figure who saves everyone, while Grendal always remains criminal with bad intentions. Grendal attacks mead hall because of jealousy. Grendal envies the fellowship and happiness he observes. He dislikes living in the outer world, excluded from the company of men thus he stalks the moors, jealous of the pleasures of mankind.