Children, Young People and Families Essay

sheath Study Four (appendix one) describes a family which due(p) to triple issues including separated pargonnts with mental wellness of necessity, siblings living apart, aggressive behaviour and hooky they present an extremely complex carapace for any affable actor. It focuses on the bosh of C entirelyum and his current status with brief make of his brother and two sisters. I pass on explore the legal and polity commission along with relevant theories and values that would say and guide hearty work drill in relation to Callum as the volume of the learning relates to him.The Every Child Matters (ECM) parking lot Paper introduced wide spread policy change and was underpinned by law in the 2004 Children Act. The ECM requires that social workers support the p bents and c atomic number 18rs sort of of removing boorren to long term care (Hodge, 2004). For exercising the ECM set verboten the agendum for the unification of local churlrens function such as aims, GPs, s ocial services and so on (Hodge, 2004). The brain of a holistic approach to a persons inescapably by removing the legislative barriers between inter path data sharing, directs services to work together towards a mutual aim which is what is trump for the child in this case Callum. other key theme set turn knocked out(p) in the ECM is early intervention, which bureau that children should receive the appropriate help so need but when they need it. An principal(prenominal) step in reaching this destination is the use of the earthy Assessment good object lesson (CAF). For Callum and others the CAF aims to put their needs ahead of the agencies agenda (Gilligan, 2008). The entire processshould be manoeuver by a lead professional person whose job it is to lead and follow up actions with all agencies involved while organism the primary contact for the child with the surplus needs, this helps when a child is working with to a greater extent than one professional as it washb owl easily become disorientating and counterproductive for the child developmentally to be dealing with multiple professionals (Howarth, 2010).For Callum and his family the CAF would be used by the local Authority (LA) to assess the needs of the children and the family as under S.47 of the Children Act they lose a duty to do so (Calder and Hackett, 2013). deep down the legal opinion deuce-ace key areas are explored. Firstly Callums developmental needs, parental capacity which although his mother is currently otiose to demonstrate capacity to care for Callum the unsanded policy context assures that she will be fully assessed and supported where possible if it is in Callums best interests to have an scuttlebutt in his life.Lastly family and environmental factors (Calder and Hackett, 2013). The three core assessment areas are explored in more detail in the assessment fabric triangle. During the assessment the social worker gains information required from individuals involved including family members and all supporting agencies. The plan is to build a complete picture that will accept the social worker to begin to grammatical construction at different theories and research which whitethorn offer insight or news report for Callums behaviours.Professor Nick cover (2013) when discussing the lessons learned from a Serious oddball Review echoes the catch outings of the Munro report (2001) stating that the decisions undertaken by social workers on a workaday basis, often with very little time, are extremely complex and involve a high degree of uncertainty. This something that the CAF attempts to address as it is to be approached as a confederacy between services the young pot and their families (Calder and Hackett, 2013). Each of the three sections of the assessment framework triangle are gone into in much more detail and commission for this is laid out in the CAF guidelines. In order to make use of the information gained a robust foundation of asso ciation is required to deliver indorsed ground implement.For example When verbal expressioning at Callums Health areall his needs being met to enable him to develop forciblely as he should. He is staying out late and not attending school so we rotter reasonably stand that he may not be getting sufficient food or rest. The medical model suggests that without regular and nutritive meals and adequate rest Callums physical development will be developmentally challenged (Cowie, 2012). This is a rather simplistic example though it effectively demonstrates how research without delay informs practice. The new policy also calls for flexibility so that services can be provided parallel to the assessment process essence that children and their families dont need to stop until after the assessment process to lead off receiving support (Calder and Hackett, 2013). When Callums physical needs are identified it is possible because without delay to for example refer him to his GP for an examination to assess his physical condition. advance along the childs developmental needs assessment we come to worked up and behavioural development which catchs at characteristics worry the childs temperament, self constraint and how they respond to stress. These are all intemperate informed by a kind base of research and theories some of which have conflicting views on how certain behaviours can be explained (Calder and Hackett, 2013).Before I look at some theories that would inform practice in relation to the case airfield I think it is helpful to look at how Beckett (2006) explains how social workers find a solution by first quest for explanations. This he says is looking at the information gathered from the assessment and trying to find a theory that we think fits and them establish the relevant intervention. He calls these past orientated approaches, in the case of Callum we look at his past to try and find out why things are the way they are (Beckett, 2006). Ca llum is displaying aggressive behaviour, he resisted foster carers and straight that he is back in a childrens home he sash out on occasion with his pose. bail theory has plenty of empirical evidence and suggests that Callum like us all is hard wired to seek a relationship with his carer, in this case the attachment with his father is still felt by him. Bowlbys (2005) work on attachment suggests that during our shaping years we develop an internal working model (IWM) from our initialattachments, the resulting woodland of the IWM is reliant on the quality of the original attachments. In Callums case he quality of this attachment could be questionable. Cassidy (1988, cited in Cowie, 2012, p.49)BibliographyBowlby, J. 2005. A secure base. capital of the United Kingdom Routledge.Brayne, H. and Carr, H. 2012. Law for social workers. Oxford Oxford University Press.Calder, M. and Hackett, S. 2013. Assessment in child care. Lyme Regis, Dorset Russell House.Cassidy, J. and P. R. small f ry (eds). 1988. Handbook of attachment. New York Guilford Press, pp.3-20. Quoted in Cowie, H. 2012. From cede to sixteen years. Abingdon, Oxon Routledge. pp.49.Cowie, H. 2012. From birth to sixteen years. Abingdon, Oxon Routledge.Frost, P. 2013. Lessons From a Serious Case Review. Interviewed by Anne Llewellyn in person Leeds, 27.11.2013.Gilligan, P. and Manby, M. 2008. The Common Assessment Framework does the reality morning star the rhetoric?. Child & Family Social Work, 13 177187Green, L. 2010. Understanding the life course. Cambridge Polity.Hodge, M. 2004. Every child matters. London DfES Publications.Horwath, J. 2010. The childs world. London Jessica Kingsley Publishers.